# Why we should celebrate (and not fear) quantum computing

Electronics

quantum research

Quantum system

Regulations & Standards

Engineering

Supply Chain

Quantum Computing

quantum computing

quantum research

Quantum system

Over the past year, various headlines have warned ominously about the impending threat of quantum computing to encryption and security. As a scientist and executive for the leading corporate program of quantum research, I can assert these fears are unnecessary. We are still decades away from breaking modern encryption with this technology, when it won’t matter anyway, for reasons I’ll explain.

More importantly, this preoccupation distracts us from what we should really be thinking about: how quantum computing will accelerate human discovery and benefit our lives. Rather than fear quantum advances, we should celebrate them.

The power of quantum computing lies in its unique properties. It exploits the laws of quantum physics to perform operations on data that go well beyond the capacity of the binary digits, or bits, upon which today’s computers are based.

#### Qubits exhibit states known as superposition, entanglement, and quantum interference

Quantum systems do this by using extraordinarily delicate quantum bits, or qubits, which are extremely difficult to manufacture and keep stable. These qubits exhibit states known as superposition, entanglement, and quantum interference. By manipulating them we can massively increase our ability to compute. We believe it will take a system with at least 50 qubits to begin handling certain problems that no classical computer can ever solve on its own, no matter how large.

Modern encryption is based on the premise that the factoring of numbers required to break encoded information is nearly impossible to do with current systems. In fact, it would take many thousands of years even for the most powerful supercomputers to figure out. However, in 1994 MIT mathematician Peter Shor developed his famous quantum algorithm demonstrating that factoring would be exponentially faster on a quantum computer.

But here’s the catch: factoring the kinds of numbers used for encryption on a quantum computer will require *tens of* *millions* of qubits that achieve fault tolerance. That’s tens of millions more physical qubits of higher quality than we have in quantum computers today. Systems like this are many years away and will require advances in physics, mathematics, and engineering.

#### Powerful universal quantum computing processor contains 17 qubit

To put this into perspective, earlier this year IBM successfully built and tested its most powerful universal quantum computing processor, which contains 17 qubits. It will serve as the core prototype processor for IBM Q, an industry-first initiative to build commercially available universal quantum computing systems.

With this foundation, we anticipate scaling future processors to include 50 or more qubits within the next few years. We continue to make many advances toward this goal. But neither we nor anyone else in the industry are anywhere close to posing a threat to encryption. By that time, researchers will have discovered new encryption protocols that are either “quantum proof” or that leverage quantum mechanics for even higher levels of security. This work is already underway.

What is far more exciting to us are the many benefits early quantum computers are expected to provide to society in just the next few years. In that time, we anticipate the discovery of new algorithms that can run on these systems that untangle the complexity of molecular and chemical interactions, address complex optimization problems, and make artificial intelligence much more powerful. Such advances could open the door to new scientific discoveries, life-saving drugs, and huge improvements in supply chains, logistics and the modelling of financial data.

This is a pivotal time for quantum research, when we should focus our energies on the true promise of this emerging technology, and not imagined threats. The truth is we are on the verge of a new age of human discovery with quantum computing. And that is something worth celebrating.

Print this page

Didn’t IBM announce a 50 qubit computer in November 2017? That puts us far ahead of the pace of progress predicted in this article. Also, the author states that “tens of millions of qubits” will be required to break encryption. However, that is making some assumptions about error correction and stability that may no longer be valid. (IBM is touting the scalability of this new 50 qubit processor.)

Newer research also suggests that to perform the factorization required to break asymmetric cryptography like RSA, ECC, etc., only a small portion of the workload of Shor’s algorithm needs to be done on a quantum computer. Much of the work can be handed off to classical computers once the quantum CPU does its magic. This brings us that much closer to breaking algorithms on which the entire Internet depends on for security.

If I captured a stream of SSL data today, what’s to say that in 10, or 5, or perhaps as even 2 years, I couldn’t analyze what I captured, break the encryption, and see what was transmitted? Since we very often use asymmetric encryption to transmit symmetric encryption keys, those keys would be at risk as well, even if the symmetric cryptography itself was immune to quantum computing. Clear text everywhere!

That would seem to be the real threat: It’s not that we have to have quantum-safe solutions in place at some point in the future, just before quantum computing is available, in order to protect data from that point on. It’s that we have to think about protecting data NOW so that it cannot be recorded and decrypted later. There don’t seem to be any workable solutions for this today. Lots of theories, but nothing I can deploy.